In Yim v. J's Fashion Accessories, Inc., where J's Fashion sued Yim for failing to pay for goods he bought under the name Ho Tae and Yim denied liability on the grounds that he had been acting as an agent for Hosung Enterprise, Inc which also did business under the name Ho Tae, the courts held that:
A) Yim was not liable because he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
B) Yim was not liable, even though he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
C) Yim was liable because he never disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
D) Yim was not liable because he had apparent authority
E) Yim was liable because he disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q298: Because of the duty to inform, an
Q299: Bill is an attorney in Ohio. Marla
Q300: Because of the duty to inform, an
Q301: An agency ends without any action by
Q302: An agency can be ended upon reasonable
Q304: A(n) _ is one whose identity is
Q305: A(n) _is liable to a third party
Q306: A(n) _is liable to a third party
Q307: An agency may not be ended by:
A)
Q308: When an agency is terminated:
A) the agent's
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents