In Coelho v. Posi-Seal International, were an employee was fired without good cause despite explicit statements by the company president that the employee had job security, the supreme court of Connecticut held:
A) there to be an express contract that was breached by the employer
B) there to be an implied contract that was breached by the employer
C) the employer violated an implied covenant of good faith
D) that the employer violated public policy
E) that the employee was at-will, so had no case
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q364: According to the California supreme court in
Q365: Employee handbooks usually do which of the
Q366: In Guz v. Bechtel National, Guz was
Q367: An employee works for 20 years for
Q368: A company that buys patents for the
Q370: Putting a bold disclaimer at the front
Q371: In Guz v. Bechtel National, where Guz
Q372: Which of the following is a common
Q373: In Guz v. Bechtel National, where Guz
Q374: If a company manager expressly tells an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents