In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, the Supreme Court held that for a party to have standing to challenge an administrative decision they must be "an interested party."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, the Supreme Court held that for a party to have standing to challenge an administrative decision, they must have suffered an injury in fact that is concrete and particularized and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical. The concept of being "an interested party" is not the standard used by the Court to determine standing.

In Lujan V