Salman received information about stocks from Michael Kara, his future brother-in-law, who received inside information from Michael's brother, Maher Kara, who worked at Citigroup's investment banking group. Salman and Michael made numerous identical trades and earned significant income. Michael confessed to federal investigators. Salman was convicted of insider trading but contended that he was an innocent tippee who did not receive information directly from Maher who provided the tips and that Maher did not know he was receiving the information. The appeals court held that there was:
A) no evidence that Maher knew that either Michael or Salman was using the information, so there was no intent to engage in insider trading.
B) no evidence that Maher knew that Michael was passing information to Salman, so Salman was an innocent tippee.
C) evidence that Maher knew Michael was using the information but no evidence that he knew Salman obtained the information, so Salman was an innocent tippee.
D) evidence that Micheal hid the source of the information, so Salman thought he was lucky or smart.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q439: Fact Pattern 21-1
In 2005, Bettina opened Bettina
Q440: The detailed arbitration records from disputes involving
Q441: ACAP and Gary Hume were fined and
Q442: Fact Pattern 21-1
In 2005, Bettina opened Bettina
Q443: Fact Pattern 21-1
In 2005, Bettina opened Bettina
Q445: Salman received information about stocks from Michael
Q446: Fact Pattern 21-1
In 2005, Bettina opened Bettina
Q447: ACAP and Gary Hume were fined and
Q448: Fact Pattern 21-1
In 2005, Bettina opened Bettina
Q449: Fact Pattern 21-1
In 2005, Bettina opened Bettina
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents