In Schuchmann v. Air Services Heating and Air Conditioning a home owner bought a heating and A/C unit with a lifetime warranty. After five years the company refused to honor the warranty because it was too expensive. When the consumer sued, the courts held that:
A) the FTC acted against the company on behalf of similarly affected consumers and won warranty enforcement for all such consumers
B) the company proved that its warranty was not "lifetime" as to ordinary maintenance, so the consumer's claim was rejected
C) the company was losing money on the warranty so, to prevent bankruptcy, could limit its liability to five year's coverage
D) the attorney general could sue on behalf of all similarly affected consumers in the state
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q321: When the FTC tried to sue a
Q322: In Schuchmann v. Air Services Heating and
Q323: The Used Car Rule requires dealers to
Q324: Under the FTC's Used Car Rule the
Q325: The "Mail Order Rule" states that if
Q327: The R-value Rule is:
A) a FTC trade
Q328: When the FTC tried to sue a
Q329: Under the FTC's Used Car Rule the
Q330: The "Mail Order Rule" states that if
Q331: Under the FTC's Mail-Order Rule:
A) shipping dates
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents