In U.S. v. Trenton Potteries, the Supreme Court held that the defendants' price-fixing agreements were legal under a rule of reason analysis because they resulted in lower prices for consumers.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In U.S. v. Trenton Potteries, the Supreme Court held that the defendants' price-fixing agreements were illegal under the Sherman Antitrust Act, and that the rule of reason analysis did not apply to agreements that unreasonably restrained trade. The defendants' price-fixing agreements were found to be harmful to competition and consumers, and therefore in violation of the antitrust laws.

In US V Trenton Potteries, the Supreme Court Held That the Defendants