In Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., the Supreme Court found evidence of an illegal tying arrangement between product service and the sale of spare parts for Kodak machinery.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is true. In the case of Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., the Supreme Court found that Kodak had engaged in an illegal tying arrangement by requiring customers to purchase Kodak parts and service in order to use their equipment. This violated antitrust laws by creating a monopoly and restricting competition in the market.