In U.S. v. El Paso Natural Gas, where El Paso wanted to merge with another natural gas pipeline company, the Supreme Court would not allow the merger because:
A) the concentration ratio in the relevant product market was too high
B) the concentration ratio in the relevant geographic market was too high
C) a vital utility like natural gas should not be monopolized
D) the firms were potential competitors
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q249: In reviewing the competitive effects of mergers,
Q250: When a merger increases concentration, a defense
Q251: Under the merger guidelines a major reason
Q252: A firm's market share refers to:
A) the
Q253: To use the failing firm defense, the
Q255: When a merger between two competitor firms
Q256: In FTC v. Proctor & Gamble, the
Q257: In FTC v. Proctor & Gamble, the
Q258: In the case of U.S. v. Baker
Q259: One successful defense that some firms have
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents