In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, the Supreme Court held that resale price maintenance can help promote interbrand competition, which it identified as the primary purpose of the antitrust laws. This decision marked a shift from the previous per se illegality of resale price maintenance established in Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons, recognizing instead that under certain circumstances, such practices could have pro-competitive effects.

In Leegin Creative Leather Products V