In Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services, Kodak was charged with tying the sale of service of their copiers and other equipment to the sale of parts. The Supreme Court ruled:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court ruled that Kodak could be found to have violated antitrust laws by tying the sale of service for its equipment to the sale of its parts, even though it did not have a monopoly in the equipment market, because it controlled the parts market and used that control to limit competition in the service market. This decision was significant because it focused on the control of aftermarket parts and services, not just the primary market for the equipment itself.

In Eastman Kodak V