Under the common law, courts deciding pollution cases would require a plaintiff to prove:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Under the common law, courts deciding pollution cases would require a plaintiff to prove harm caused by the polluter and unreasonable interference with other parties' rights, which is covered in option D. Intentional pollution may make it easier to prove these elements, but it is not a necessary requirement. Option E goes beyond what is required under the common law.

Under the Common Law, Courts Deciding Pollution Cases Would Require