With regard to chemical restriction or banning under TSCA there is:
A) no presumption of innocence, the EPA need not show a chemical poses a health hazard before restricting or banning it
B) a presumption of innocence, the EPA must show a chemical poses a health hazard before restricting or banning it
C) a presumption of innocence, but the firm producing the chemical must prove that there is no health hazard
D) no presumption of innocence, the firm producing the chemical must show that it is no health hazard before it begins production
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q388: The practice of buying or restoring other
Q389: Permits to dredge wetlands often include:
A) a
Q390: In Hearts Bluff Game Ranch v. U.S.,
Q391: The manipulation of biological processes to produce
Q392: Under the Toxic Substances Control Act, the
Q394: The manipulation of biological processes to produce
Q395: Wetlands mitigation banking is:
A) the practice of
Q396: Biotechnology is:
A) not subject to TSCA
B) subject
Q397: To grow cranberries, Eva used a wet
Q398: Under TSCA, the EPA is responsible for:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents