In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that:
A) courts may not review decisions of the FWS regarding such listings
B) the listing was proper as FWS explalined its rationale sufficiently
C) the listing was improper because the FWS failed to show that its survival was in danger unless very strange assumptions were made
D) the listing was arbitrary and capricious as the FWS failed to justify its decision based on scientific evidence
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q438: Dano owns a waste disposal site. Armand
Q439: The _ is the agency with primary
Q440: Magnetics may buy a plant site in
Q441: In practice, the focus of the Endangered
Q442: Ozone depletion at high levels in the
Q444: Under the Endangered Species Act, the _
Q445: Which of the following is NOT an
Q446: Which of the following is an effect
Q447: Under the Endangered Species Act, the _
Q448: Which of the following is NOT an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents