Nik sold to Paul a real property payable in monthly installments within a 5 year period, Paul was only able to pay 14 monthly installments, after the 60 day grace period and after 30 days of Paul's receipt of the notice and letter calling for the rescission of the contract Nik rescinded the same. Paul contended that there was an automatic rescission done by Nik, hence, the same was void. Give the best answer.
A) The rescission done by Nik was in faithful compliance with the Maceda Law, as the grace period and the sending of notices was complied before rescission
B) The rescission done by Nik was void as it fell short on compliance with the law, as the notices sent by the latter would not suffice the requirement of a notarial act.
C) Paul has a right to demand payment for damages caused by the automatic rescission done by Nik, the same being void under RA6552
D) Answer not given
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Which of the following is correct?
A)A rescissible
Q11: Mr. P, a passenger in Allied Bus
Q12: What is the legal concept of possession?
A)The
Q13: Can it be argued that the Martial
Q14: Which is not an element of Novation?
A)The
Q16: Under a contract of guaranty, may the
Q17: May a mortgagor's liability on labor claims
Q18: Which of the following is not a
Q19: Article 1157 at the Civil Code enumerates
Q20: A court is empowered to ignore an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents