Contracts
-Candi agrees to sell Carla a purebred puppy for $2,000. Candi puts the agreement in writing. Later, Carla argues that Candi told her that she would only need to pay $1,500. Will the parol evidence rule prevent Carla from testifying to this conversation?
A) Yes, because the testimony would directly contradict the written contract's terms.
B) Yes, because a change to a written contract must be made in writing.
C) No, because contracts to sell puppies do not have to be in writing.
D) No, because it is permissible to use extrinsic evidence to show a modification to an existing agreement.
E) Yes, because extrinsic evidence only can be used to show lack of consideration.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Contracts
-If there was a "meeting of the
Q6: Contracts
-Isaiah owns Home Supply Superstore. Home Supply
Q7: Contracts
-Which of the following will not terminate
Q8: Contracts
-Which is a limitation on a party's
Q9: Contracts
-Which are three ways in which a
Q11: Contracts
-Meg agreed to get Mary a cell
Q12: Contracts
-"This Agreement shall be governed by the
Q13: Contracts
-"The contract is indefinite,""The contract was required
Q14: Contracts
-Which of the following remedies is not
Q15: Contracts
-Brian and Bradley are art thieves. Together
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents