Which of the following statements would not be in violation of NASAA rules regarding the
Sale of investment company shares?
I. "Investing your money in shares of this money market mutual fund is identical to putting your money in a savings account at a bank, except the money market fund provides a higher return."
II. "Our U.S. government bond fund is invested only in government bonds issued by the U.S. government and is, therefore, a risk-free investment."
III. "You are investing $22,000 in this fund today. The fund has a 5% load at this investment level, but if you sign a letter of intent to invest another $3,000 within the next 13 months, your load will be reduced to 4%. If something comes up and you can't invest the extra $3,000 within 13 months, you will only need to pay the difference in the two loads."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Only Selection III would not violate NASAA rules regarding the sale of investment company shares because it is the only true statement. If a fund has a breakpoint at $25,000 that triggers a reduced front-end load and allows an investor to receive the reduced load charge if the investor signs a letter of intent stipulating that the additional investment will be made within 13 months, the only penalty to the investor who doesn't meet the breakpoint is payment of the difference in the two loads. Investing in shares of a money market mutual fund is not identical to putting money in a savings account at a bank. The bank account is insured by the FDIC in most cases; the money market mutual fund is not insured by the FDIC, and the investor can lose money (although, to date, money market mutual funds have covered any losses that they've experienced and not passed those losses onto their investors.) A U.S. government bond fund that is invested only in U.S. government bonds is free from default-risk, but it is still subject to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, the value of the bonds in these funds-and therefore the fund itself-will decrease.

Which of the Following Statements Would Not Be in Violation