Sheila is a paralegal who works for Paul, an attorney representing the plaintiff in a commercial-litigation case. As requested by Paul, a subpoena was issued and served on Ruf-n-Tuf Chainsaw Company, a third party to the lawsuit. Paul is only interested in the correspondence, including e-mail, between employees of Ruf-n-Tuf and the defendant. The subpoena set a deposition for Ruf-n-Tuf's custodian of records for September 15, but included a standard letter stating that the deposition will not be necessary if Ruf-n-Tuf provides copies of the correspondence as requested. Is it necessary in this situation for Sheila to arrange for a court reporter just in case Ruf-n-Tuf would prefer an actual deposition?
A) Yes.
B) Yes, but only if Ruf-n-Tuf agrees to pay for the court reporter.
C) No.
D) No, unless the defendant objects and demands the deposition take place.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: An investment company entered a contract with
Q31: A development company from Illinois entered into
Q32: Under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules
Q33: Under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules
Q34: Angela is a paralegal who works for
Q36: Under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules
Q37: Under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules
Q38: Cameron is a paralegal for Roland, who
Q39: Under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules
Q40: Kip is a paralegal for Lauren, an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents