Nathan's thesis research revealed that federal health-care funding allocation for American citizens currently held as prisoners was substantially larger than federal health-care funding allocation for Native American citizens. As a result of his finding, Nathan not only narrowed his thesis topic to argue for increased federal funding for Native Americans, he also began a vigorous social media campaign to pressure legislators to bring this obvious inequity to the forefront of debate. What approach would you suggest Nathan use to debate this issue?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A.Incorrect. Evidence and outcomes are important components of debate; however, they do not satisfy the requirement of the scenario.
B.Incorrect. The intent of the scenario is to encourage and foster discourse (argument) in the hopes of finding common ground.
C.Incorrect. Compromise and caring are the opposite approaches to facilitate argument.
D.Correct. This option is much more attentive to the undercurrents of dissatisfaction and the sense of injustices amongst vulnerable persons or ethnic minorities.

Nathan's Thesis Research Revealed That Federal Health-Care Funding Allocation for American