Which statement best characterizes the consequences of the Supreme Court's decision in the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v Sawyer case?
A) In theory, the decision essentially mandated that all presidential actions be subject to judicial review, but in practice, the courts have rarely held presidents accountable for the constitutionality of their actions.
B) In theory, the decision essentially demarcated the space where presidential actions were subject to judicial review, but in practice, the courts have deferred to executive branch interpretations.
C) In theory, the decision essentially demarcated the space where presidential actions were not subject to judicial review, but in practice, the courts have deferred to legislative branch interpretations of what that space constituted.
D) In theory, the decision essentially established the nature of a political question, but in practice, the courts have generally preferred to let political questions be sorted out by the other two branches of government.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: The decision of Baker v. Carr represented
Q20: What does the political question doctrine make
Q21: Justice Robert Jackson's concurring opinion in the
Q22: Questions that are considered to be in
Q23: The president enters the "zone of twilight"
Q25: The source of many of the confrontations
Q26: The decision of the Supreme Court in
Q27: The siding of the Supreme Court with
Q28: Who serves as the federal government's primary
Q29: The Solicitor General's record in advocating for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents