Charles Eliot and other social-efficiency liberals believed that they were serving the interests of democracy with their vision of progressive education. Explain their point of view according to their conception of democracy. Next, evaluate their educational and political points of view by your definition of the educational requirements of democracy.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Charles Eliot and other social-efficiency liberals believed that they were serving the interests of democracy with their vision of progressive education because they saw education as a means to create an informed and engaged citizenry. They believed that by providing a practical and vocational education, they were preparing individuals to actively participate in the democratic process and contribute to the economic and social progress of the nation. They also believed that by promoting a standardized and efficient education system, they were ensuring equal opportunities for all citizens, thus upholding the democratic principle of equality.

However, their educational and political points of view can be evaluated in the context of the educational requirements of democracy. While their emphasis on practical skills and vocational training may have been beneficial for economic development, it may have neglected the importance of critical thinking, civic engagement, and the development of a well-rounded individual capable of participating in a diverse and complex society. Their standardized approach to education may have also limited the diversity of perspectives and experiences that are essential for a thriving democracy.

In my definition, the educational requirements of democracy include not only the acquisition of practical skills but also the cultivation of critical thinking, civic responsibility, and a deep understanding of democratic principles and institutions. Education should also promote diversity, inclusivity, and the ability to engage with different perspectives and ideas. Therefore, while the vision of progressive education by Charles Eliot and other social-efficiency liberals may have served certain interests of democracy, it may have fallen short in addressing the full range of educational requirements necessary for a vibrant and participatory democracy.

Charles Eliot and Other Social-Efficiency Liberals Believed That They Were