Opponents of excluding illegally obtained evidence from trial argue that
A) nobody should be convicted of a crime on tainted evidence.
B) a guilty person should not go free because the police blundered.
C) the Supreme Court has reversed itself and now permits all such evidence in trials.
D) the police should be allowed to sue criminals for their injuries using such evidence.
E) the exclusionary rule was rejected by the Constitutional Convention.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: In many countries which have state-supported churches,
Q26: The historical source for the metaphor of
Q27: The Supreme Court's first interpretation of the
Q28: In 1989 Pittsburgh was allowed to display
Q29: Since the First Congress in 1789, the
Q31: In the Mapp v. Ohio decision, the
Q32: One reason for adopting the exclusionary rule
Q33: During an arrest, the police may legally
Q34: The constitutional ban on being forced to
Q35: Miranda has been extended to mean that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents