The Supreme Court has ruled that laws prohibiting "fighting words" must have narrow applications.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court has held that laws targeting "fighting words" must be narrowly tailored so as not to infringe upon free speech rights unnecessarily. This principle was established in the landmark case Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), where the Court recognized that certain categories of speech, such as "fighting words," could be regulated but must be done so in a way that does not broadly restrict constitutional rights.

The Supreme Court Has Ruled That Laws Prohibiting "Fighting Words