In Father & Sons Home Improvement II V

In Father & Sons Home Improvement II v. Stuart, the court determined that

A) Father & Sons' contract was not enforceable because it was not in writing.
B) The parties created a consensual lien that was enforceable.
C) Father & Sons committed constructive fraud by misrepresenting facts in the lien.
D) Stuart was required to pay the amount of the mechanics lien.