In Triffin v. Pomerantz Staffing Services, 851 A.2d 100 (N.J. Super. 2004) , the court held that Friendly's (and Triffin's as its assignee) :
A) met the "with notice" requirement
B) met the "without notice" requirement
C) failed to meet the "without notice" requirement
D) failed to meet the "with notice" requirement
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Article 3 of the UCC provides a
Q24: Article 3 uses the word reasonable to
Q25: In Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v. Easy
Q26: The _ requirement is particularly important to
Q27: _ notice is not sufficient notice to
Q29: The _ rule provides that the transferee
Q30: The UCC does not confer a _
Q31: Article 3 of the UCC contains the
Q32: Article 3 provides for real defenses that
Q33: Article 3 provides for personal defenses that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents