Defendants can have video surveillance evidence dismissed as an invasion of privacy.

Name: Defendants can have video surveillance evidence dismissed as an invasion of privacy.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (46 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Video surveillance evidence obtained in public places or in areas where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy is generally admissible in court. The legality of the surveillance depends on where and how it was conducted, not on the defendant's perception of privacy.

Defendants Can Have Video Surveillance Evidence Dismissed as an Invasion