MATCHING -Consent Defense

MATCHING
-Consent defense

A) States that the defendant lacked the mental state to understand the nature and consequences of the crime.
B) The defense that a child is too young to either be prosecuted or stand trial as an adult.
C) Asks the question, "Was the defendant predisposed to commit the crime?"
D) Holds that a defendant "is presumed to be sane and possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to the jury's satisfaction" beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) The condition of a person who unknowingly ingests an intoxicating substance.
F) Asks the question, "Would an innocent person be induced to commit the crime by the officer's acts?"
G) The defense that the defendant had the victim's consent to perform the acts.
H) The condition where a person knowingly ingests an intoxicating substance.
I) Techniques used by law enforcement to catch criminal activity that fell short of entrapment.
J) A defense used when law enforcement officials lure a person into committing a crime.