"Stop and frisk" searches are unconstitutional because officers lack probable cause.

Name: "Stop and frisk" searches are unconstitutional because officers lack probable cause.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.8 (46 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

"Stop and frisk" searches, as outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio (1968), are considered constitutional if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. This standard is lower than probable cause.

"Stop and Frisk" Searches Are Unconstitutional Because Officers Lack Probable