MATCHING
-Rebuttable presumption
A) Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
B) An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
C) The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
D) The 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant's criminal trial.
E) Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
F) The act of giving testimony against one's penal interest.
G) The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
H) Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
I) Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
J) A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: MATCHING
-Exigent circumstances
A) Evidence that will change or
Q52: MATCHING
-Stop and frisk
A) Evidence that will change
Q53: MATCHING
-Evanescent evidence
A) Evidence that will change or
Q54: MATCHING
-Exclusionary rule
A) Evidence that will change or
Q55: MATCHING
-Right to Remain Silent
A) Evidence that will
Q57: MATCHING
-Confession
A) Evidence that will change or evaporate
Q58: Explain the concept of "expectation of privacy"
Q59: Explain the exclusionary rule and give examples
Q60: Explain the protections from Double Jeopardy and
Q61: Define ex post facto law and explain
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents