The replication of a finding from one study by a subsequent study is generally considered to be
A) more supportive of a knowledge claim than a finding from one study that has strong statistical power.
B) less supportive of a knowledge claim than a finding from one study that has strong statistical power.
C) unnecessary because of the development of confidence-limit methodology.
D) unnecessary because of the development of effect-size methodology.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Replication of a finding by subsequent studies is generally considered more supportive of a knowledge claim than a single study with strong statistical power. This is because replication across different studies increases confidence in the reliability and generalizability of the finding, beyond what statistical power alone can provide. Confidence-limit and effect-size methodologies, while important, do not negate the value of replication.

The Replication of a Finding from One Study by a Subsequent