A research team conducted an experiment in which they administered a mathematics test before and after students had participated in a new individualized curriculum. Parallel forms of the test were used as the pretest and posttest, and the range of possible scores was 0-100 on each. In analyzing data from the experiment, the researcher found that students in the lowest quartile on the pretest (M = 15.5) made a good gain (posttest M = 37.6), whereas students in the highest quartile on the pretest (M = 83.7) declined slightly (posttest M = 80.1). From these differences in gain scores, they concluded that the new curriculum is more effective for students of low ability than for students of high ability. What are two other interpretations that can be made of the differences in gain scores?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q31: a. What is the purpose of aptitude-treatment
Q32: Using a factorial design, a researcher conducted
Q33: Why is the A-B-A-B design considered more
Q34: What is the main difference between an
Q35: Which of the two single-case designs, A-B
Q36: Describe two potential problems that can occur
Q37: Describe two alternatives to the use of
Q39: A research team wishes to determine which
Q40: A researcher plans to test the effectiveness
Q41: A new program has been developed to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents