Many mail-order pharmacies these days are owned by PBMs. Addressing the concerns that such ownership might lead to a conflict of interest, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched an investigation into this practice and published its report "Pharmacy Benefits Managers: Ownership of Mail-Order Pharmacies" in 2005. The report found, however, that there were no significant differences between the practices of the two types of mail-order pharmacies, including no significant differences in the use of generics between PBM-owned (35% of all dispensed drugs) vs. non-PBM owned (36% of all dispensed drugs) mail-order pharmacies. Discuss what could be a valid explanation behind this finding.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q20: The hierarchy of funds to the pharmaceutical
Q21: Which drug is likely to be the
Q22: What is the average time period for
Q23: Discuss the role of risk and return
Q24: Explain the importance of the 1984 Drug
Q25: If the PBM is owned by one
Q26: Explain why R&D by surgeons in hospitals
Q27: In the U.S. health expenditures on drugs
Q28: Many mail-order pharmacies these days are owned
Q30: How would you classify the market structure
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents