At common law, evidence had to be both relevant and material to be admissible in court. It had to tend to prove or disprove a fact for which it is being offered, and it had to be material to the fact at issue. Each was a separate concept.

Name: At common law, evidence had to be both relevant and material to be admissible in court. It had to tend to prove or disprove a fact for which it is being offered, and it had to be material to the fact at issue. Each was a separate concept.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (50 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is True

At Common Law, Evidence Had to Be Both Relevant and Material