Suppose an image block happens to have the following entries:
(Note that this is a greylevel, 8-bit image, not DCT output).
Now suppose we decide to encode this image into the frequency domain as follows:
• First we go down each column, and carry out a 1-dimensional transform, replacing each column by its set of DCT coefficients.
• However, for the first column we use only a length-3 DCT (i.e., ); for the second column we use a length-2 DCT, and for the third column we use a length-1 DCT, always leaving zeros in the transform domain just where they appeared in the original, image domain.
• We leave the DC coefficient always at the top of each column processed.
• Then we use the output from the above stage and go on to do the same procedure for rows 1 to 3.
Question:
(a) Which takes more calculations, the above procedure, or the ordinary 2-D DCT transform? Explain.
(b) Broadly, what is the difference, if any, in the output DCT Image between the new transform and the standard one, for this particular image?
Note: One need not do any calculations for this question but, for reference, recall that the 2-D DCT for an block size is defined as
where , and the constants and are determined by
The 1-D DCT is given by
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q10: Suppose we view a decompressed 512×512
Q11: Suppose an alphabet consists of 6
Q12: Consider an alphabet with two symbols
Q13: Thinking about my large collection of .
Q14: Please define "motion estimation".
(b) Please define "motion
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents