There Would Be Significant Costs for Comprehensive Policies That Would

There would be significant costs for comprehensive policies that would reduce family poverty substantially,

A) but these costs would be offset in the next generation by a reduced rate of delinquency and the positive consequences of higher levels of education.
B) and this is why governments can only target smaller areas for improvement.
C) but these costs are unwarranted because there is no scientific proof that reducing poverty is cost effective for society as a whole.
D) but these costs are unwarranted because there is no scientific proof that reducing poverty improves family life.
E) but these costs would require higher taxes which would not meet with the approval of most citizens.