Amanda and Hector each produce homemade ketchup. Amanda can make ketchup at a cost of materials and labor of $1.25 per bottle, and Hector can do the same at a cost of $1.80 per bottle. People get $4.00 of value from each bottle of ketchup, and every bottle made causes $2.50 of pollution-based damage to the people who live near Amanda and Hector.
a. Would the benevolent social planner like to see either Amanda or Hector make ketchup? Explain.
b. What is the size of the ideal tax that government could implement to reduce the pollution to the ideal amount?
c. If the tax was set at twice the level of the ideal amount, would either Amanda or Hector be discouraged from making ketchup?
d. If the tax was set at half of the ideal amount, would either Amanda or Hector be discouraged from making ketchup?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q39: Figure 8.1 Q40: Figure 8.1 Q41: Figure 8.1 Q42: When the government uses a cap-and-trade approach Q43: What is the rationale behind a cap-and-trade Q44: Sulfur dioxide emissions allowances are available for Q45: To maximize the social pie, a tax Q46: The market-based system which allocates tradeable pollution Q47: Why is a solution to climate change Q49: How does a cap-and-trade system: Unlock this Answer For Free Now! View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents![]()
![]()
![]()
a. force polluters