The owners of steel companies in the US have argued that they need to be protected from foreign competition because the wages paid to workers in foreign countries are significantly lower than the wages paid to US steel workers. What is the best economic response to this argument?
A) Even though US workers earn more than workers in foreign countries, the United States would still have an absolute advantage in the production of steel and should therefore be able to compete internationally.
B) The steel industry should be protected from foreign competition because low foreign wages are an unfair barrier to trade.
C) It is essential to protect the steel industry so that there are no additional job losses in this industry.
D) Wages reflect productivity and so, if US steel workers are more productive than workers in foreign countries, then the US steel industry should still be able to compete internationally.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Which of the following statements is false?
Q10: Which of the following would be classed
Q11: Which of the following is not a
Q12: It costs a computer manufacturer £2000 to
Q13: When exports are sold at a price
Q15: The following four options are the arguments
Q16: Which of the following statements would be
Q17: Which of the following examples refers to
Q18: The cost (or 'deadweight welfare loss') from
Q19: The following diagram shows a country which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents