When Faced with Cases Involving Debates Over Redistricting, the Courts

When faced with cases involving debates over redistricting, the courts have generally

A) refused to get involved, arguing that the issue is a political question.
B) come down in favor of the closest possible expression of voter intent.
C) deferred to the decisions of the state legislatures.
D) declared all efforts at redistricting unconstitutional.
E) asserted the power of judicial review to take direct control over legislative redistricting.