How do "prosocial dilemmas" used to assess children's prosocial reasoning differ from the moral dilemmas used by Kohlberg and Piaget?
A) Kohlberg's and Piaget's dilemmas assessed moral reasoning, whereas prosocial dilemmas do not.
B) Whereas prosocial dilemmas focus on breaking rules or laws, the dilemmas employed by Kohlberg and Piaget involve having to decide whether to help someone, often at some personal expense.
C) Prosocial dilemmas involve having to decide whether to help someone, often at some personal expense, whereas the dilemmas employed Kohlberg and Piaget focus on breaking rules or laws.
D) Prosocial dilemmas are used by sociocultural researchers, whereas the dilemmas used by Kohlberg and Piaget are favoured cognitive-developmental researchers.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q78: When faced with a conflict, adolescents tend
Q79: The ability to negotiate is related to
A)
Q80: A longitudinal study followed two groups of
Q81: The possibility that biological factors might play
Q82: Early studies that relied on self-report found
Q84: Which person has a profile of characteristics
Q85: Several studies have demonstrated that children share
Q86: Getting one's adolescent involved in volunteer activities
Q87: Proactive aggression refers to acts committed with
Q88: Relational aggression refers to aggression
A) such as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents