The "Yes-ists" claim there are intelligent beings somewhere in outer space.The "No-ists" claim there are not.Which side has the burden of proof,and why?
A)The Yes-ists have the burden of proof because they are defending the more popular point of view.
B)The Yes-ists have the burden of proof because they might be able to find evidence, and the No-ists could not.
C)The No-ists have the burden of proof because they are defending the more popular point of view.
D)The No-ists have the burden of proof because they might be able to find evidence, and the Yes-ists could not.

Question

The "Yes-ists" claim there are intelligent beings somewhere in outer space.The "No-ists" claim there are not.Which side has the burden of proof,and why?​
A)The Yes-ists have the burden of proof because they are defending the more popular point of view.
B)The Yes-ists have the burden of proof because they might be able to find evidence, and the No-ists could not.
C)The No-ists have the burden of proof because they are defending the more popular point of view.
D)The No-ists have the burden of proof because they might be able to find evidence, and the Yes-ists could not.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Yes-ists are making a positive claim that intelligent beings exist in outer space which requires evidence to support it. The No-ists are simply denying the claim and do not have to prove a negative. Therefore, the burden of proof lies on the Yes-ists to provide evidence to support their claim. Choice B correctly identifies this reasoning.

The "Yes-Ists" Claim There Are Intelligent Beings Somewhere in Outer