Comparing two ways of measuring object permanence supports which of these generalizations?
A)We should be cautious about inferring what infants do or do not understand.
B)Many concepts emerge suddenly on an all-or-none basis.
C)The stages of cognitive development vary significantly from one culture to another.
D)Infants learn more rapidly by watching older children than by watching adults.

Question

Comparing two ways of measuring object permanence supports which of these generalizations?
A)We should be cautious about inferring what infants do or do not understand.
B)​Many concepts emerge suddenly on an all-or-none basis.
C)​The stages of cognitive development vary significantly from one culture to another.
D)​Infants learn more rapidly by watching older children than by watching adults.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Comparing two ways of measuring object permanence, such as the violation-of-expectation method and the A-not-B error task, can reveal inconsistencies in infants' understanding and highlight the importance of being cautious when making claims about what they do or do not comprehend. Therefore, the best choice is A. Options B, C, and D are not supported by this comparison.

Comparing Two Ways of Measuring Object Permanence Supports Which of These