Martin wins a car in a lottery. As he already owns a car, he decides to sell the new one to his friend Ted. While driving the car, Ted gets into a head-on collision with another car. Due to a defect in the vehicle's Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) , the airbag does not deploy and Ted is seriously injured. Which of the following statements is true of this situation?
A) Martin can be held strictly liable because he sold the car to Ted.
B) The car manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable as Ted had not bought the car from them.
C) Martin cannot be held strictly liable as the sale of the car counts as a casual transaction.
D) The driver of the other car can be held strictly liable due to his or her involvement in the accident.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: A person driving over the prescribed speed
Q17: Ruggers is a maker of a range
Q18: A doctrine under which damages are apportioned
Q19: Jim suffered an injury in an automobile
Q20: What is meant by the doctrines of
Q21: Allenby Spares, Inc. is a shop that
Q23: Betty buys a lawnmower, manufactured by FlatPlanes,
Q24: _ is liability without fault.
A) Res ipsa
Q25: Mary was getting a ride home in
Q26: Erin was shopping for an aluminum extension
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents