Lionel is the managing director of Train Pty Ltd, a company that makes diesel locomotive engines. Thomas enters into a contract with Train Pty Ltd for the purchase of a locomotive engine. The contract is signed by Lionel on behalf of Train Pty Ltd. After entering into the contract Thomas discovers that Lionel was not properly appointed as the managing director of Train Pty Ltd by the board of Train Pty Ltd as was required by its constitution. The contract is:
A) Not binding because Lionel had no authority to act on behalf of Train Pty Ltd.
B) Would only be binding if it was signed by two directors of Train Pty Ltd in accordance with section 127(1) of the Corporations Act (Cth) 2001.
C) Binding because Thomas can assume that Lionel had been validly appointed as managing director.
D) Binding only if the company ratifies the contract.
E) Both (b) and (c) .
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Vicarious liability means a company is responsible
Q6: Tony enters into a contract to purchase
Q7: Alex enters into a contract to purchase
Q8: Wheelie Ltd runs a business selling car
Q9: Magnus is a salesperson employed by Jaxx
Q11: How do companies exercise their legal capacity
Q12: What is the organic theory?
Q13: When is a contract binding on a
Q14: What is a "common seal"?
Q15: 6. What is (a) substantive authority; and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents