A couple (the Blarts) were advised by their financial planner to buy an investment property and to pay all their loan repayments only against the loan they had for their private property and to let the interest on the investment loan capitalise and thereby to let the balance of the loan on the investment property continue to increase as this would then provide for them additional deductions. Is this arrangement likely to be disallowed under the provisions of Part IVA of the Income Tax assessment Act 1936?
A) No. This is an example of tax avoidance
B) No. This is an example of tax evasion
C) No. This is an example of a sham
D) Yes as the taxpayers have no subjective intent to avoid tax
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Abe is a self employed plumber. He
Q2: K Pty Ltd and M Pty Ltd
Q3: Alistair has a discretionary trust and this
Q5: Chevmon Australia Ltd is a subsidiary of
Q6: Egoism is an ethical principle which aims
Q7: Dianne has donated $10,000 to a registered
Q8: As Peter does not like paying tax
Q9: Boris worked for ABJ Electrical as an
Q10: A decision to invest a large sum
Q11: Deontological ethics is more concerned with what
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents