Which statement about a Franks hearing is true?
A) The purpose of the hearing is to allow a criminal defendant to challenge the veracity of an affidavit used by the police to obtain a search warrant.
B) A simple allegation of falsity and/or material omission is insufficient to trigger (initiate) a Franks hearing.
C) The defendant bears the burden of proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that an application for a warrant contained false statements that were knowingly or recklessly made, or alternatively that material information was knowingly or recklessly omitted from the warrant application.
D) All criminal suspects are entitled to a Franks hearing.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Which description lacks sufficient particularity to satisfy
Q5: To qualify to issue a warrant, the
Q6: Under rule 41(c) of the Federal Rules
Q7: Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443
Q8: Officers executing a search warrant for a
Q10: Probable cause to search has two requirements
Q11: Which description does not satisfy particularity requirements?
A)
Q12: What were all-purpose warrants referred to in
Q13: For Fourth Amendment purposes, a seizure of
Q14: In a situation where an officer acts
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents