Select the statement that reflects the Court's ruling in Chimel v. California.
A) an officer may search the person arrested and the area into which he could reach for a weapon without additional justification.
B) an officer needs additional articulable suspicion that the arrestee is armed in order to search the arrestee for weapons.
C) an officer needs additional reasonable suspicion to search the area into which an arrestee could reach for a weapon.
D) an officer may without additional justification search the person arrested, but a search of any other area requires additional justification.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: For a search incident arrest to be
Q2: What is the most significant personal advantage
Q3: Which of the following are needed for
Q4: A person is "picked up for questioning"
Q6: What basic element distinguishes formal arrest from
Q7: A formal arrest occurs when a person
Q8: A police officer informs a citizen that
Q9: Modern definitions of the crime of resisting
Q10: Select the true statement about limited searches
Q11: In Tennessee v. Garner (1985), the Supreme
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents