Based on Chimel v. California, what is the key question in deciding whether or not a warrant is required to open a container seized incident to arrest of a person?
A) Is the container closely associated with the arrestee's person?
B) Is the container still in the arrestee's immediate control?
C) Is the container owned by the arrestee?
D) Is the container both closely associated with the arrestee's person and still in the arrestee's immediate control?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: A police officer has arrested a man
Q36: In general, if a police officer makes
Q37: If officers make an arrest within a
Q38: The Gant v. Arizona (2009) case limited
Q39: A police officer has made a custodial
Q41: How does the Court define "use of
Q42: An officer has made an investigative stop
Q43: The courts have ruled that a(n) _
Q44: What is meant by the term exigent
Q45: Under what circumstances may law enforcement perform
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents