Police detectives begin to interrogate a criminal suspect without having read the Miranda warnings. During this initial questioning, the suspect makes an incriminating statement. The detectives, after hearing the incriminating statement, make the suspect aware of his Miranda rights. Questioning continues and the suspect repeats the incriminating information. How are the courts most likely to view the statement?
A) The incriminating statement is inadmissible.
B) The incriminating statement is admissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is inadmissible.
C) The incriminating statement is inadmissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is admissible.
D) The incriminating statement is admissible, as is any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Which of the following tactics, if used
Q13: A police interrogator conducted an interrogation of
Q14: When governmental coercion is at issue, most
Q15: Failure to comply with Miranda requirements _.
A)
Q16: To have a valid waiver of a
Q18: What is the essential reason why the
Q19: Which statement most completely describes the relevant
Q20: The essential ingredient which must be present
Q21: Age, mental capacity, and similar characteristics are
Q22: Both confessions and admissions are incriminating statements.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents