Mayer wrote Jackson and offered to sell Jackson a building for $50,000. The offer stated it would expire 30 days from July 1, 2010. Mayer changed his mind and does not wish to be bound by his offer. If a legal dispute arises between the parties regarding whether there has been a valid acceptance of the offer, which of the following is correct?
A) The offer cannot be legally withdrawn for the stated period of time.
B) The offer will not expire prior to the 30 days even if Mayer sells the property to a third person and notifies Jackson.
C) If Jackson phoned Mayer on August 1 and accepted the offer, it would create a contract, provided he had no notice of the withdrawal of the offer.
D) If Jackson categorically rejects the offer on July 10, Jackson cannot validly accept within the remaining stated period of time.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q56: A stipulated means acceptance sent by a
Q57: Under the ILSFDA, pending litigation involving developers
Q58: Mrs. Clements gave the University of Iowa
Q59: Baker Corporation sent a letter to Sampson
Q60: Smith and Jones entered into a contract
Q62: An option:
A) Can be revoked at any
Q63: For a real estate contract to be
Q64: For the doctrine of part performance to
Q65: Earnest money:
A) Is the deposit on a
Q66: In new home sales:
A) There is an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents