Edward and Elena Pucossi reside in Louisville, Kentucky, and purchased a lot on Nolin Lake in Edmonson County, Kentucky. They contracted with a builder to construct a lake house for them for a total contract price of $20,400. When the Pucossis had paid a total of $16,050 to the builder, the builder abandoned the project and could not be located. The lake house was never completed and was never occupied.
Bee Spring Lumber had furnished $8,292.68 in lumber and materials for the Pucossi project to the builder. Bee Spring Lumber had a lien against the property and brought suit to collect on that lien. The Pucossis claimed that they could not be held liable for more than the contract price because this was residential construction. The trial court held that the statutory exemption did not apply to vacation homes, only owner-occupied homes, and held the Pucossis liable for the full amount ($8,292.68) owed Bee Spring Lumber. Is the trial court correct?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q82: Discuss this state's theory of priority of
Q83: What is the effect of the failure
Q84: The following parties are involved:
Owner - Tanner
Q85: The following parties are involved:
Owner - Tanner
Q86: Explain when lien foreclosure is required.
Q87: Explain why there is no widely adopted
Q88: Describe the protections that exist for homeowners
Q89: Charles Keating, the former CEO of Lincoln
Q91: Assume the following sequence of events:
Construction began
Q92: On February 20, 2003, Dick's Sporting Goods,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents