The Fighting Words Doctrine determined that
A) violent acts may be justified if provoking language is harsh enough.
B) censorship can be justified against insulting language that is likely to provoke violence.
C) libel does not apply where a history of "fighting words" can be proven between the two parties.
D) language, no matter how violent, is still protected by the First Amendment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Elizabeth Baer and Charles Schenck were arrested
Q26: How did the government justify stopping the
Q27: This 2001 law gave federal agents new
Q28: The book industry objected to the Patriot
Q29: The "'Fire!' in a crowded theater" test
Q31: The TPM Standard states that
A) government can
Q32: Government agents opposed Ulysses being distributed in
Q33: What was the major distinction between the
Q34: The New York Times v. Sullivan case
Q35: The term "commercial speech" is the legal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents